The framework has symlinks to paths on a Mac that I doubt Andy Matuschak uses anymore. Gatekeeper rejected the app because I’m using Sparkle 1.5b6. $ ls -ls amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr.lproj/fr.lprojĨ 1 craig staff 84 Jul 22 12:31 amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr.lproj/fr.lproj > /Users/andym/Development/Build Products/Release/amework/Resources/fr.lproj $ ls -ls amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr_CA.lprojĨ 1 craig staff 84 Jul 22 12:31 amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr_CA.lproj I dug around in the application package contents and saw the following: This seemed unlikely since the frameworks are code signed during the copy build phase and our automated build process creates a ZIP archive just after the app bundle is created. Gatekeeper is rejecting xScope because it thinks some files in Sparkle have been modified after the code signature was generated. In subcomponent: /Users/craig/Downloads/xScope.app/Contents/Frameworks/ameworkįile modified: …/amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr.lproj/fr.lprojįile modified: …/amework/Versions/Current/Resources/fr_CA.lproj XScope.app: unknown error -67003=fffffffffffefa45 prepared:/Users/craig/Downloads/xScope.app/Contents/Frameworks/amework/Versions/Current/. $ codesign -verbose=4 -deep -strict xScope.app The -deep option checks any embedded code (such as the Sparkle framework.) Note that -strict is a new option in El Capitan (so new, that it’s not documented yet): The functional equivalent to spctl -a is the following codesign command. According to the man page, “This is useful … to access newly invented assessment aspects that spctl does not yet know about.”) In El Capitan, the cause is more stringent code signature checks. In the past, this has been caused by a change to the signature version number (from 1 to 2). This is a sign that there’s a problem with the code signature. When I ran the spctl tool on El Capitan, I saw an “obsolete resource envelope” error: (If you’re one of those people that claims that “Radar never works”, then that last paragraph just proved you wrong.) The change in El Capitan has the potential to affect a lot of developers ( including the big guys), so it’s time to share what I learned. This led to feedback from Apple that helped me understand why Gatekeeper rejected my app. I quickly filed a Radar about the problem. As the author of a tool used by so many early adopters, I often get the job of figuring out what’s new with code signing. Users/craig/Downloads/xScope.app: acceptedĬlearly there is something new with Gatekeeper in El Capitan. I had tested the build on Yosemite, and it passed without any problems: The fuzzy dashboard icons define xScope's rough workshop feel.After releasing a update for xScope with fixes for El Capitan, I launched the app on a fresh install of the OS and was greeted by this dialog: The browser needs a favorites manager powerful enough to reorder the icons according to your preferences. The dashboard lays out thumbnail icons and links to popular sites, which you can futz with in the settings. In terms of the app's overall lack of polish, xScope's start screen needs the most work. There are various builds for various versions of the Android operating system, including a premium version for Android 2.0 (Droid and Nexus One phones at the time of this review) that also handles Web downloads in addition to xScope's standard YouTube video downloading. We like the quick bookmarking, and can appreciate the task killer, even though it's not a tool we'd seek out in a browser. xScope browser tends toward flexibility, offering three ways to zoom in, open and close tabs, and switch among open tabs-including a simple finger swipe. Its bundle of features includes tabbed browsing, some interesting management controls, the ability to copy text, and support for skins (you'll download the skin set separately). However, what it lacks in looks it makes up for in functionality. XScope Web File Task Browser is far from being the most beautiful mobile browser for Android.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |